Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Industry That I Heart’ Category

April 12, 2013
Ron Johnson’s exit at jcpenney this week wasn’t exactly huge news to those who’d been watching the company fall off a cliff in 2012. Boards tend to notice when the losses start approaching the one-billion-dollar mark.
Now we get a deluge of analyses from retail experts and amateurs alike. I would only remind you of one basic rule of life:

Don’t believe everything you read.

I’ve been surprised at how many articles either misunderstand the retail industry or conveniently misplace the facts about the challenges facing jcp.
So what the heck, I’ll throw in my two cents as well. I didn’t work for jcp, but as some of you know, I was involved in the jcp advertising that ran on the Oscars this year and last.
To better appreciate how and why Ron failed, you have to go back to the beginning.
Ron became CEO of jcp after a long period of courtship. He was being recruited to be on the board by investor and board member William Ackman. Ron’s great successes in retail (Target, Apple) and fresh point of view were seen as a breath of fresh air. And boy, did jcp ever need that.
Under its previous CEO, Myron “Mike” Ullman, jcp was clearly on a downward slope — yes, even with hundreds of sales each year and its Sunday supplements filled with coupons. It was still profitable, but the writing was on the wall. American shopping habits were changing dramatically. Big department stores were losing their appeal as more people were either shopping online or moving toward the specialty shops in the malls. Despite a core of loyal customers, and despite that “big sale” mentality, the store was fading in the public consciousness.
Concerned about its future, jcp needed to replace Ullman with someone who could reinvigorate the brand. The stores had to continue appealing to old customers, to be sure, but if the company were to thrive, it would need to attract new customers as well.
Ron Johnson seemed to be exactly what jcp needed. Wall Street vigorously approved, and jcp’s stock price rocketed at the news of his hiring.
Just a few months later, Ron unveiled his vision for the “new” jcp at a flashy NY event for retail industry analysts and journalists. jcp would be turned into a collection of a hundred shops, featuring great quality brands. And, instead of artificially inflating prices at the start just to have a big sale later, jcp would offer honest low prices every day. Again, the stock price jumped. People who lived and breathed the retail industry loved what they saw — even as they heard Ron estimate that it would take 2-3 years to complete the company’s transformation. Re-making 1,100 stores is a mammoth undertaking.
So what went wrong? Well, that’s where all the expert opinions come in. Many of which I believe are overly simplistic or just plain wrong.
Here are The 5 Big Mistakes That Led to Ron Johnson’s Ouster at JCPenney as described by Brad Tuttle at Time.com. I have seen others link to it as “a good analysis.” I disagree.

[Ron] misread what shoppers want.
Tuttle says that despite the trickery involved, shoppers love sales. Obviously there’s some truth to that. It’s also true that people love great quality at great prices, which is what Ron planned to offer. Given the right mix of products that people love, low prices, gorgeous stores and a great marketing campaign, it’s hard to say the plan was doomed to failure. Remember again, most industry experts thought it was a winning plan when it was first unveiled. Since Ron’s vision was never realized, it’s sheer speculation that people wouldn’t have loved the new jcp. But there’s a more important reason to dismiss Tuttle’s reason #1. Even with the neverending sales and barrage of coupons offered by jcp before Ron arrived at the scene, jcp’s numbers were dwindling. Catering only to the mindset of the traditional jcp shopper was not an option. Something had to change.

He didn’t test ideas in advance.
Okay, I’ll give Tuttle partial credit for this one. Obviously, knowledge is a good thing. But let’s not forget the support Ron had for his pricing vision. The man has his expert advisors. Wall Street bought into it. And the renowned brands that Ron was bringing into the store were super-eager to be part of what they saw as a winning plan. “Oh yeah?” you say, “well, they were ALL wrong — that’s why testing is so important!” Well, my answer to that is that Ron and all the experts weren’t wrong. The vision was a great one. What wasn’t so great was the road map to get there. Hang with me for a bit.

He alienated core consumers.
This is actually part of the previous point. No further comment.

He totally misread the JC Penney brand.
This is totally silly. True, jcp has a brand. True, that brand has meaning for its customers. But very few brands remain motionless as time goes on — especially when that brand is sliding toward irrelevance. Tuttle pooh-poohs the idea of creating a collection of cool shops, saying that people don’t want “a fun place to hang out.” The reason jcp was dying is that people were less interested in going there. Despite its sales, it was boring. Ron’s plan to transform jcp into a place people might actually want to go was absolutely right on. No matter where you shop, there’s a little thing called “the shopping experience.” It dictates whether you go back to that store anytime soon. To be blunt, the shopping experience at the old jcp sucked. Ron’s plan to turn jcp into a place you’d want to visit — with cool shops staffed by specialists, free wi-fi, fast checkout, etc. — was very seductive. I believe it would have built a bigger, better and more relevant jcp brand. Ron would have been pleasing the core customers as he attracted a wave of new customers.

Overall, he didn’t seem to like or respect JC Penney.
Could not be further from the truth. jcp has thousands of employees, representing thousands of opinions. Part of the CEO’s job is to get employees to rally behind his vision. There were plenty of people at jcp who were excited about Ron’s path to the future, and there were those who were “old school” and resistant to change. No doubt one can dig up plenty of quotes from those who might question Ron’s love of jcp. Unless you hear it coming from Ron himself, it’s all hearsay.

What I heard directly from Ron was a deep, unwavering love of jcp — the brand and its people. He studied the writings of the founder, James Cash Penney, and often quoted him. And here’s a little shocker for you: good old James Cash hated sales and gimmicks. He didn’t believe in “marking up prices just so we can mark them down.” He believed in total respect for the customer — and that’s what Ron played back at every opportunity. Ron did not have a “distaste for the company” — he had a profound sadness that the brand had fallen to such low levels. His greatest goal was to restore jcp to its former status as “America’s favorite store.” Tuttle also notes that Ron had a “disdain” for the customer base, which again is absolutely 100% untrue. The creative team heard one thing from Ron consistently from our very first meeting, that our mission was to “put a bear hug around Middle America.” That’s the jcp customer. With his every idea, Ron was trying to win the love of his customers. He wanted to make their money go further, give them great merchandise and have them enjoy the shopping experience.
So — if Ron was so right about everything, why did it end so spectacularly bad?
In my opinion, there is one very simple reason. I don’t mean to minimize it, because it’s a horrific miscalculation, and I can understand why Ron would be dismissed because of it:
Ron failed because he changed the prices long before he could visibly change the stores.
He did a basic cleanup of the selling environment (eliminated junk and switched to whole-number pricing). Then, before he could widen the appeal of jcp, he took away the one thing traditional customers were hanging onto: sales and coupons.
As noted earlier, jcp sales had been sloping downhill for quite some time before Ron arrived. However, the patient was not yet in critical condition. What Ron should have done is keep the existing pricing policy in place while he more quietly built the “new jcp” in the background. He could have been bringing in exciting new brands and renovating stores more progressively, without forcing customers to go cold turkey on sales and coupons.
He ripped out the old before the customers could really see the new.
That, very simply, is why Ron’s plan didn’t work. There may be other contributing factors, but they weren’t store-killers on this level.
So what’s jcp’s future now? Personally, I’m extremely curious to learn what will happen to (a) Ron’s vision for the physical appearance of the stores, (b) his vision for the shopping experience, and (c) the relationships Ron had nurtured with some great brands (Michael Graves, Jonathan Adler, Terence Conran, Martha Stewart, etc.).
I hope jcp has the ability to right the ship. However, the company’s latest actions don’t exactly inspire confidence.
Ron was hired because the policies of the previous CEO weren’t working. He has now been replaced by that very same CEO. When it was announced that Ron was out, jcp stock rose 10% in after-hours trading. When it was revealed that Ullman was taking the job, the stock dropped 6%. It appears to be a “who is less bad” situation, rather than “who would be great.”
According to this article, Board member Ackman said last May that under Ullman, jcp was “chronically mismanaged.” This week he said Ullman is “the right guy at the right time.” Spin is a wonderful thing, isn’t it?
And what becomes of Ron? If I were him, I’d take a nice long vacation and look at the world of possibilities. Ron is one of the nicest, most inspiring people I’ve worked with. He loves retail, and he loves delighting his customers.
Hard to imagine he won’t be doing that again.

Read Full Post »

Bwahahahahaha, Karma is a B*tch.


Tuesday, 09 April 2013 11:52
CARA WATERS
JB Hi-Fi shares soar 10% on positive earnings guidance: Retail recovery in sight
Financial planning firm with $6 billion in funds under management collapses
Harvey Norman sales boost reflects improved consumer sentiment, recovering retail sector
Gear changes in the road race of retailing
Target announced yesterday that its boss, Dene Rogers, was departing after only 15 months in the top job at the retailer.
Coles store development and operations director Stuart Machin will replace Rogers following the shock departure.
Wesfarmers boss Richard Goyder said Machin would review all aspects of the business, including the range of categories it offered under its apparel, fashion and general merchandise model, as well as its store footprint.
“Stuart will be high energy, and you only need to look at the change in Coles stores to see the impact he will have,” he said.
“There have been quite a lot of questions about whether Kmart and Target can co-exist…they can.”

Industry sources told SmartCompany Rogers did not depart of his own volition and was not out in Target’s stores as much as he should have been.

Pressure was building on Rogers after Target’s flat full-year earnings for 2011-12 alongside the inclusion of a charge of $40 million for a restructure of its supply chain.
Nomura retail analyst David Cooke said he was not surprised by Rogers’ departure.
“Target is in the midst of a turnaround strategy and changing management in the middle of that is not ideal,” he says.
“It may lead to some tweaks to the strategy, but we believe the overall strategy is likely to remain intact.”
Cooke says the primary issue for Target is to identify the retailer’s proposition.
“Quite frankly, Kmart has taken the cheap and cheerful mantle. Where does Target fit in – is it going to move up towards Myer? It has to find its niche in the marketplace,” he says.
“Issue number two is that it seems the supply chain is not as cost-effective as it should have been and rectifying this is unlikely to happen overnight.”
David Gordon, partner at Bentleys Melbourne, says Rogers’ problem was that the management team he put together had gaps.

“He did not surround himself with the right management team,” he says.

Gordon says the resurgence of Kmart has also played a part in the performance of Target.
“There is an understanding in the market that Target has lost its way and strategically it needs to concentrate on deciding and then strengthening its positioning in the consumers’ mind,” he says.
“I think the store-level execution of the business over the last six months has been lacking in terms of incorrect range and the stocking and layouts of stores, whether that was due to ineffective execution or an out of line products strategy, I don’t know.”
Gordon says newly appointed Target boss Machin has a very good reputation even though he is a tough operator.
“From what I hear in the market place, there is a terrific level of respect for him both internally and from various suppliers,” he says.

Read Full Post »

I walked through a shopping mall the other day and it really hit me that conventional retail is really dying. Shops, stores, specialty shops, big box massive stores, independent shop owners, all of it are just fighting for their lives.
Their biggest fight right now: The Internet.
What’s worse is not so much that conventional retail is not adapting, not changing, and not fighting back, it is that it is killing it’s own damn self.
Customer service ratings are at an all time low. Retail is no longer a career, it is a job. No one has pride in their product knowledge, their service or after service, and far fewer retailers actually care who walks through their doors whether they made a purchase or not. I was always taught, and luckily at an early start in retail, that anyone who walks past your lease line is a customer. Treat them as if they were going to spend thousands that day, that visit, whether they looked like it or not, whether they had the means to or not.
Customer behaviors and the use of the mall are changing. Other than still the mallrat/adolescent hangout, the retail stores are being used for customers who want to try on things, do their inspection on items, touch, feel, see purchases, and then run to the internet (or order them right there in the store) from the internet at usually 30-40% cheaper than the price that’s on the item in front of them.
Retail needs to fight back. Retail needs to find a way.
After working for six months with the company I’m with today, I know that even a fragmented, archaic industry such as building supplies will soon be taken over by the Internet. The percentage of business and purchases done on the internet in my industry today is still relatively small, but if you parallel other industries such as electronics, apparel, and office supplies, the internet is inevitably going to be the biggest player, and soon.
Retail must find a way. Retail must fight back.

Song of the Day: Thank You – Jay-Z

Read Full Post »

Now that Target is up and running, a bunch of old industry people have called me to see what I think. The funny part is that I’ve never been to any of the Canadian stores, and quite frankly after 6 months out of the business, I’m not really paying as careful attention as I was before.
This I know, they’ve just done their last round of major hiring, which means that their rosters have been carefully evaluated for over 9 months, and they have the right people in the right places for their org chart. With Sears just laying off a bunch of people, many of them were scooped up by Walmart or Winners (the killer W’s).
This I predict: of the markets that Target is open, the Walmarts there will take 30% dips in foot traffic and revenue. In those same Markets, Sears would lose about 30-40% in traffic (transactions) and 25% in revenue. The biggest and only advantage Sears has in those markets: Appliances and Mattresses. In those same markets, the Bay, Holts or high end would experience a 15% drop in traffic, but would recover by the end of Spring. Sears would not recover so fast, and may risk losing 20-30 rural leases on stores that just can’t turn over their red books. Walmarts in those markets will fight back with Rollback and Layaway, and look to cut Target where they can. Even stores like Old Navy, Gap, Joe Fresh, Tommy Hilfiger, and private brand houses like Forever XXI and Suzy Shier aren’t safe. Target will fight back with a secret weapon: Designer collaborations. This brings the sexy back into the game.
What’s funny about what’s happening in this retail game is that the size of the pie is not getting any bigger. Retail in Canada has shrunk in consecutive years for the last 12 years. With Target coming in to Canada and about 40-50 locations, you have a player that is instantly going to gobble up market share and their slice of the pie, and with a pie that isn’t growing, someone is going to lose out. Maybe even close their doors and walk away from the pie altogether.
Segment by segment, category by category, Target will surgically go after whomever they can. Right off the bat, they’re going to go after Women’s Fashion, Men’s Staples, Kids Wear, Cosmetics, Consumables, packaged goods, small appliances, and whatever’s left of the brick and mortar store electronics. everything else will only be a matter of time and a fight.
As a customer, it’s going to be fun to watch all of the pricing and sale action. As a former employee of the industry, it’s going to be fun to see who lives, who dies, and what the next evolution of retail will bring!

Song of the Day: Ooh Child – The Five Stairsteps

Read Full Post »

By Andy Porter · 02.04.2013

One of the things we’re known for doing here at FOT is shooting straight with our readers and telling you how things really work in HR. If you’re looking for a sugar coated message you’ve come to the wrong place! So I’m going to let you all in on a secret…the traditional performance rating system that the vast majority of companies use doesn’t work. Not only does it not work, I’d go even further and say in no particular order they are generally meaningless, tend to demotivate people, are rarely understood, poorly administered and a big fat waste of organizational time. Now I suspect there are some of you are reading this and shaking your head in extreme agreement. You can move on to the next post then. But if you don’t agree with my assessment let me give you the 3 reasons why I don’t think performance rating systems work…

1. Ratings are falsely precise metrics. Assigning someone a numerical rating gives the perception that the system is “data-based and objective” and often we go to great lengths to try and convince employees of the system’s objectivity. Well I’ve got news for you – the process is entirely subjective. Yeah, you may have 10 pages of competencies to rate someone on but guess what? A real live human being is making the judgment and their judgment is subjective. Wrapping this natural subjectivity up into a number and calling it objective is at best confusing and at worst demotivating.

2. Ratings distract from what really matters. How many of you out there have ever sat through a “calibration” meeting? Wait – did I say meeting? I should have asked how many of you have ever sat through weeks of calibration meetings? The goal of most calibration meetings isn’t a bad one. Striving for some consistency in how performance is assessed across a division or organization is generally a good idea. That is until you invited the performance rating to the party. In my experience most of the time is spent arguing about of each of us interprets the rating scale and questioning why someone’s ratings are too high. While everyone is trying to understand what it means to be a “5″ we’ve missed an opportunity to talk about what someone actually accomplished. Or worse, since subjective human beings don’t always agree on interpretations we just revert back to the mean (which penalizes actual top performers).

3. Ratings are a crutch for managers. The lifeblood of any successful organization lies in the ability of its managers to provide good feedback to their employees. That means sitting down and really thinking about someone’s performance and offering specific examples and advice on how to improve. In the world of performance ratings a manager has the option to simply tell an employee their rating, assume they know what it means and move on. Which conversation would you prefer? It’s a no-brainer yet we happily hand out this crutch on an annual basis.

Look, I understand that for some organizations performance ratings make sense for a variety of reasons. But there’s also a lot of companies out that who are simply following what they consider to be “best practice” who have an opportunity to do something different. I’ll talk more about what I would do in place of performance ratings in an upcoming post. In the meantime I’m curious what people have to say about “death to performance ratings!

Read Full Post »

Here’s a fun exercise if you have a day of shopping ahead of you. Go to a big box department store and look at a name brand product price tag. Odds are, it will be pretty high. Now take 30% off that price and you will have what the average selling price of that product. Now figure out what it is at 50% off, and imagine that stores would sell 30-40% of how ever many units they bought of that product at that price. Imagine that they’re not even paying the bills once they go 50% off. Now calculate what 70% off that product is. If you take the cost of the lights in the store, the payroll to staff, storage costs, shipping costs, lease on the land, and even the cost of the hanger, they’re paying you to take that item off their hands at 70% off. Now imagine you have 70% off, plus an extra 20% if you use your store card, and an extra 10% off because of some wild cat promotion. Shortcut, that’s still only 78% off. Now imagine how much money they’re losing at that price. Now if you go to that store in July or January and you see how much clearance and just how much inventory of product is at that price, and you look at the state of the store and which store you’re in, you can realize just how poorly they’re doing.

Pricing is a very fun game to watch. People will pay for what they believe in, for brands they see inherent VALUE in, perceived value. One person would pay $300 for a pair of jeans that another person would only pay $100 for. It’s all relative and subjective. That’s the brand’s creative marketing and promotional job to create that value proposition and entice you to want to pay for their product, their logo, and their brand.
Stores try to use that marketing to get you to go into shop and buy what you’ve just been sold on. This is capitalism at it’s finest.

I will say that when a store creates a private brand, a house brand, or their own brand, the pricing structure and cost structure is different (even for George, Joe Fresh, H&M, Top Shop, and other non-brand brands). Fundamentally, you take the same math, but they are usually promoted at 50% off, they lose money at 70% off, and they’re in the deadpool on anything below that (if that’s even possible).
And don’t even get me started about Winner’s and Marshall’s methods.
That’s another conversation over another drink.

Read Full Post »

The worst thing plaguing big box department store retail in today’s day and age is that they are obsolete, dinosaurs, on the verge of extinction. The old model does not work. Today’s customer is global, global minded with global access, and also wireless and on the go.
These companies are run by dinosaur company values and dinosaur organizational charts. Even worse, the people at the tops of those charts are caught up in dinosaur age old mentality, processes, and are so far out of touch with reality that they hire an insulation layer of VPs underneath them to feed them information (9 times out of 10 it’s information that is only good to protect their jobs, benefits, and pensions, and not what’s right for the business. Besides, what do they care about the next 20 years when they themselves will only be there for 5-7 yrs?)
These organizations have a track record of poor hiring, incestuous recruitment practices, and turning a blind eye towards executives biggest failures and weaknesses. Once these executives are comfortable at the top, they layer in their “yes men”, and basically run a math algorithm on everyone else. How much salary and benefits can they bear with the productivity they are currently squeezing, and to which point to they hit that tipping point of squeezing blood from rocks?
Of course, this isn’t EVERY big company and department store, and there are many other issues that are attacking them as well, but at the root of the problem, you have to see that the PEOPLE are the ones who are the difference makers.
In most cases with such large organizations, the people below don’t have tangible measurables nor do they get the proper support they need to excel and go above and beyond expectations. Working longer hours don’t make you any more productive than bringing your dog to work. 60+ hour work weeks don’t show me anything about your drive, your ambition, your talent and skills, your savvy, other than you’re just stupid with a lot of time on your hands.
Or, the targets are moving and/or are set completely unachievable because the company is in constant flux in direction and personnel. I have seen a person change roles 3 times in a department in a year, which might sound great because they are moving up or laterally, but in the end, they never really DID anything. They never put a stamp on anything. They never ACHIEVED anything.
Sure, these companies can lure you with big money, big benefits packages, heck, even 4 weeks vacation. If I hadn’t joined the company I’m in now, I would have never been able to see that it’s all just… not… worth… it. None of it. Not one cent. Sure, I came away with some learnings by fire, sure I know what not to do, and sure I am stronger for surviving it. But as most damaged goods go, you still get jaded. I’ve been both fortunate and blessed that I’ve lived to tell the tales of these places, and I am stronger for having achieved success despite the challenges from within the businesses (Never mind from outside of the businesses).
I guess that’s why they always ask my opinions.

Song of the Day: Beds are Burning – Midnight Oil

Read Full Post »

I Tried to Told You…..

Toronto – The Canadian Press
Published Thursday Jan 31, 2013

Sears Canada Inc. announced Thursday it is laying off 700 workers across the country as part of a move to “right-size” the company and focus on restructuring its business.
The national retailer says 360 people are being laid off from its department stores and about 300 from its distribution centres. The remaining workers are being let go from head office and other support areas.

The job cuts will be across Canada.
“This is part of our initiative to right-size the organization, which is working in concert with other initiatives to make Sears successful,” said Sears spokesman Vince Power in a statement.

The city of Belleville in eastern Ontario, where Sears has a distribution centre that deals with small-ticket catalogue and online sales, will lose 120 jobs — the largest single cut in the current round of downsizing.
A distribution centre in Regina, which also deals primarily in smaller items for western customers, will lose 80 jobs. There will be smaller job losses at distribution centres in the Toronto and Montreal areas, which deal more with larger items, and at two small distribution centres in Calgary and Vancouver.
By contrast, the job losses at Sears retail operations will be smaller — in the range of two to four people per store.
Mr. Power said the distribution centres are feeling a bigger impact because “over time we’ve been able to improve some processes, so we’re able to do more in the distribution centres.”

“And also we didn’t want to affect customer service in the stores.”

Sears Canada has been revamping operations to encourage more customers to return to its stores after years of declining sales, and also to prepare for the entry of numerous U.S. retailers, including discount chain Target Corp.
In a report assessing the impact of Target’s arrival, released last fall, Barclays Capital said that Sears Canada, Wal-Mart, Old Navy, Loblaw’s Joe Fresh brand and Canadian Tire are the retailers most at risk.
The company has 195 corporate stores, 269 hometown dealer stores, eight home services show rooms and more than 1,500 merchandise pick-up locations.
Amid declining sales, Sears announced in December that it was closing four of its prime stores in three cities — Vancouver, Calgary and Ottawa. The locations are being taken over by major U.S. retailer Nordstrom for its first Canadian locations.

This month, Sears Canada announced a new partnership with the Aldo Group, who will design and manufacture footwear lines for their Nevada, Attitude and Jessica brands.
It also inked a deal with Buffalo International Inc., which will produce an entire line of women and men’s Nevada denim-based apparel for the department store.

Read Full Post »

Call it fighting fate. Call it great timing. Call it genius chess move. Call it survial instinct. Call it what you will. I have been blessed in my life with some really fortunate timing and great career moves at the right time and right place.
I knew I was taking a leap of faith not only living Toronto, but leaving the entire apparel industry. It was still calculated and the odds were telling me that it was time to get out, but after 15 years of expertise in a field that borned me into retail, it was very difficult to let go.
Six months into my new job and my new industry, and I’ve never ever thought about going back. The new company has embraced me with it’s culture, values, and constant new horizons and growth, and there is fewer and fewer reasons for me to turn my shoulders around.
Something very tragic and abrupt happened today. Just under 100 people were let go/fired from my former employer in the apparel industry back in Toronto, many of them I worked with and crossed paths with. The person who hired me back in 2009 was actually also let go today without warning. A gentleman who had 35 years tenure was let go just like that. He has not written a resume in those 35 years. He’s going to be in big trouble once his severance package expires. Many younger greener people than I were let go, but let’s be honest, they were just riding the whirlwind, trying to look for options with other companies and using that company as a stepping stone anyways. Don’t even ask me what that company’s stance on employee loyalty and retention is. There are many things I could say about management and the CEO that are there, but I won’t right now. The one thing I will say is that they all blatantly lied right to my face. They aspired to be a top 100 employer in Canada, and steps like these certainly bring them no closer to that goal. One of the other Senior Vice Presidents who was in my interview was also let go/dismissed/stepped down today. I asked her face to face in my interview what was different than the reputation as the revolving door of the retail industry, and she lied to my face explaining that they were trying to implement a culture of change and I was a key part of that ingredient in their recipe for culture change and the way they do things. Ok, well she didn’t completely lie to me, but suffice it to say that she was caught in her own B.S.

There will be an article put out in the news later today because there was over 50 people let go at one time, they have to report it to Employment Canada for statistical reasons. They will also put a marketing spin on it such as “out with the old and in with the new”, “we are looking for new blood with new ideas and bringing the whole brand and banner into a new generation of retail”, but it is all lies. Smoke and mirrors. More like faint smog and busted dirty mirrors. They are quite quickly running out of time and ammunition. Once Target opens it’s doors in Canada, it’s going to be open season for head chopping. No secret that Target and Walmart are going to duke it out. Holts and Harry’s will be virtually untouched. The Bay will run a 70% off Topshop event and that will bring people back through their doors. Sears will have nothing. No ammunition. No shots to fire back. With traffic already being down to record lows, how can they rebound from a 40% traffic loss in markets where there is a Target? People are already fed up with their lack of customer service, lack of store clarity, false pricing and promotions, and the archaic state of their stores. What are they going to do, run a Warehouse Sale, a Scratch and Save, a BOGO on the whole store? Makes no difference. They are a dinosaur of a retailer and it will only be a matter of days before they are pushed off the evolutionary cliff.

Song of the Day: Ordinary World – Duran Duran

Read Full Post »

So… Work is going well (relatively speaking). Compared to my previous 3 jobs, there is no need for therapy or venting. I’m finding that the survival tactics that kept me afloat in those previous jobs are putting me leaps and bounds ahead of others in my current role.
The company itself has doubled in size since I started, and is going after a 100% increase for 2013. How refreshing is it to hear a company (not just a category, but the whole darn company) going after an increase in today’s market? What’s scary is that the 100% target is actually LOW for our company. With all the market indicators pointing in the right direction for us, the growth number is going to be insane.
I’m always thinking four steps ahead in my career, and by nature I’m seeing some good things for once in the last ten years. Who ever really knows how long my run at this place is going to be. All I know is that I’m not actively looking for another option at this point in time. The options are actually looking for me and searching me out.
I’m going to ride this one out as long as it will take me. The old guard and the old industry continues to eat itself and it’s not very appealing right now. Sure, if I went back I would survive and be as good as I was when I left, if not better. Sure, I have tentacles in that network that would get me in and I’d have options and choices. But is that even the answer for me at this point in time? Oh. Hell. No.
We must continue to push onwards and upwards. #KeepGoing or so they say.

Song of the Day: Big Time – Peter Gabriel

Read Full Post »

Marina Strauss – RETAILING REPORTER
The Globe and Mail
Published Wednesday, Jul. 25 2012, 8:19 AM EDT
Last updated Wednesday, Jul. 25 2012, 7:30 PM EDT

Grocer Loblaw Cos. Ltd. is making a big retail bet in the United States with its Joe Fresh fashion line, amid slowing spring sales of its cheap-chic offerings in a sluggish Canadian apparel market.
On Wednesday, Loblaw said it will roll out almost 700 Joe Fresh shops next spring within troubled U.S. department-store retailer J.C. Penney, getting close to achieving its goal of running as many as 800 Joe Fresh stores across the United States.

Loblaw’s four-year deal with J.C. Penney emerged as the country’s largest grocer reported that its second-quarter Joe Fresh sales failed to get a lift from a year earlier. What’s more, teaming up with J.C. Penney is a risky step. The U.S. company is struggling through a massive makeover under Ron Johnson, a retail star who took the top job late last year after launching tech giant Apple’s iconic stores. The latest deal raises the stakes for Loblaw and Joe Mimran, creative director for Joe Fresh.
“It’s a gamble – of course it’s a gamble,” said Walter Loeb, president of retail consultancy Loeb Associates in New York and a former director of Hudson’s Bay Co., noting that Mr. Mimran has taken chances before. “I think this is going to be a winner.”

Joe Fresh has been one of the few engines of growth for Loblaw, which has been scrambling over the past six years to return to its glory days. Now the grocery titan is racing to find more ways to pump up its Joe Fresh business and feeling the heat to make its J.C. Penney partnership work.
Loblaw is counting on J.C. Penney’s Mr. Johnson and his vision to reinvent the department store with specialty shops such as Joe Fresh and a new pricing strategy, emulating his success in re-imagining electronics retailing for Apple.
“Ron is looking for brands – he’s looking to really differentiate himself in the United States,” Mr. Mimran said in an interview. “He’s looking to transform the business and he wants to do it with innovation. I think our brand offers that.”
Vicente Trius, president of Loblaw, said the deal with J.C. Penney carries limited financial risk, requiring no capital expenditure on the grocer’s part and probably just a few people to manage the business.
It will boost Loblaw’s bottom line from the get-go, he said. “We see it as promising.”
Mr. Trius acknowledged that Joe Fresh grappled with flat second-quarter sales. But he noted that the overall apparel industry’s sales were in decline. Meanwhile, the six Joe Fresh U.S. stores are meeting expectations. In May, Joe Fresh ranked as the top clothing brand in Canada, according to market researcher NPD. Analysts say the brand is close to generating $1-billion of sales a year, although Loblaw does not break out the figures.

Joe Fresh operates in about 300 stores in Canada, mostly Loblaw superstores, but also in 12 standalone stores, as well as six stores in the New York City area.
Mr. Mimran has said he envisions eventually opening stores beyond North America.
He said on Wednesday that the J.C. Penney deal means that Joe Fresh will open many fewer standalone stores in the U.S. than originally contemplated – perhaps just 30 to 50 as flagships in urban centres.
He said Mr. Johnson got in touch with him about four months ago because he was impressed with the Joe Fresh offering. “They started referring to our line … as an inspiration for their own J.C. Penney line.”

Now with the J.C. Penney deal, the scale of the Joe Fresh expansion will be unprecedented for a Canadian brand, he said. “It will give us national exposure. It’s akin to a roll-out but done very quickly.”
At J.C. Penney, Mr. Johnson is trying to create specialty shops, including Joe Fresh, within the department store with cafés and juice bars along a wide aisle – called the Street – connecting the shops, according to a report this week by industry publication Women’s Wear Daily. Staff will be equipped with hand-held devices to speed checkouts and research products.

Still, results so far have been disappointing, raising concerns about Mr. Johnson’s new strategy, particularly his move to drop coupons and sales in favour of low everyday pricing and monthly value deals.
J.C. Penney “has its work cut out for it,” said Peter Sklar, retail analyst at BMO Capital Markets. But for Loblaw, “I don’t see how it’s going to be negative.”

Read Full Post »

MARINA STRAUSS – RETAILING REPORTER
The Globe and Mail
Published Wednesday, Jul. 18 2012, 8:18 PM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Jul. 19 2012, 7:04 AM EDT

The fast-shifting department-store landscape is getting another jolt from a U.S. retailer.
Nordstrom Inc. of Seattle is finalizing its plan to set up shop here in four locations, including three top sites that Sears Canada Inc. is abandoning this fall. The plans come as Sears announced on Wednesday it will close yet another store, at Deerfoot Mall in Calgary.

Upscale Nordstrom plans to launch its first stores here at the Pacific Centre in Vancouver, Chinook Centre in Calgary and Ottawa’s Rideau Centre – whose leases Sears sold back to landlord Cadillac Fairview Corp. this year for $170-million – as well as Sherway Gardens mall in Toronto, industry sources said.
Nordstrom’s long-awaited entry into the Canadian market within the next few years hits the retail market at the same time that a bevy of foreign retailers are arriving here, including U.S. cheap-chic Target Corp. in 2013.
The latest addition is bound to pinch mid- to high-end fashion incumbents, including Holt Renfrew, the Bay and Harry Rosen.
“Some of the fancier stores will find that the competition has heated up,” said Hermann Kircher, a retail real estate consultant in Toronto.
“It will have a negative impact on Holt Renfrew – not devastating but something they would notice … The Bay would feel the impact of Nordstrom also.”
Spokespeople for Nordstrom and Cadillac Fairview on Wednesday said they had no news to share.
Nordstrom’s conservatively stylish offerings and attentive customer service will further shake up the market. The new addition comes as the Bay rapidly overhauls its strategy to move more upscale, while Holt’s and Harry Rosen refine their luxury appeal to gear up for a more brutal retail scene.
Amid the changes, giant discounter Wal-Mart Canada Corp. is investing in its largest expansion yet as it prepares for Target’s arrival, while Zellers is closing its underperforming stores to make way for Target after the U.S. chain bought most of Zellers’ leases from Hudson’s Bay Co. for $1.8-billion. The Bay, for its part, has talked to upscale U.S. department-store Bloomingdale’s about a partnership that could see Bloomingdale’s boutiques in Bay stores.
“There will continue to be a lot of change in the market,” said Neil Linsdell, an analyst at Industrial Alliance Securities in Montreal. “Everybody is going to have to step up their game.”
Adding to the uncertainty, mall operators and Nordstrom officials have been locked in negotiations for months as the U.S. retailer makes its painstaking decisions on store sites for Canada.

Nordstrom is known to drive a hard bargain, demanding relatively low rents in exchange for drawing big crowds to its stores and the rest of the mall.
Nordstrom is still awaiting approval from its board of directors for the four new Canadian locations as well as final documents, industry sources said.
It is believed the retailer also wants to open a store at Yorkdale Shopping Centre in Toronto, one of the country’s top malls with average sales of about $1,300 per square foot.
The centre’s owner, Oxford Properties, was prepared to put aside a 165,000-square-foot space for Nordstrom near the mall’s subway entrance, sources said.
But Oxford also wanted Nordstrom to open a store at its Square One Shopping Centre in Mississauga, Ont., which the U.S. chain is reluctant to do, they said.
Nordstrom is also believed to covet the Sears flagship store site at the Toronto Eaton Centre, but Sears chief executive officer Calvin McDonald said recently he is not looking to unload that lease, which is believed to cost Sears only about $1 per square foot in rent. Sears runs its head office on the top floors of the site.
Vincent Power, a spokesman for Sears, said on Wednesday that the retailer is not looking to sell other leases beyond the four already unveiled.
The new CEO is focused on his three-year plan to turn around Sears, including re-focusing on core departments such as appliances and mattresses and revamping existing stores.

Sears’ lease sales come as its U.S. parent plans to spin off a large part of its stake in its Canadian unit, which steps up pressure on it to bolster its performance and eliminate businesses with poor returns.
Mr. Kircher, the consultant, predicted Sears will take advantage of more store closings when leases expire or even before, as it is doing with its Deerfoot store. , whose lease runs out next year.
“I don’t think it looks all that great for Sears,” Mr. Kircher said.“They have to make some drastic changes.”
Mr. Kircher said there’s room for a retailer such as Nordstrom, which is positioned at a price level between the Bay (except for its tony Room fashions) and Holt’s. The Bay is trying to occupy more of the higher end space but there may still be room for another player, he said.

Read Full Post »

By SCOTT SIMPSON, Vancouver Sun

Vancouver ecommerce company BuildDirect’s plan to disrupt the retail building products sector just got a lot more focused.
The company on Monday received a $16-million infusion of cash from OMERS Ventures, the venture-capital investment wing of the Ontario municipal employees’ pension fund, to accelerate its growth in a North American market that appears vulnerable to online competition.
The money will go toward hiring additional staff and to expand the BuildDirect product line to make it even more competitive with retail outlets.
It’s one of the biggest venture-capital financings this year to a Canadian ecommerce company. In March, OMERS announced a $20-million investment in Vancouver digital darling HootSuite.
According to recent research from sources in the United States, the flooring market in the U.S. alone is worth $17 billion a year, and the broader building market almost $500 billion.

BuildDirect is a sort of amalgam of Home Depot and Amazon.com, working exclusively online to cost-effectively deliver heavy and bulky finished construction products — notably flooring, tile and brick — through its own supply chain. Shippers bid in real time to give customers what BuildDirect describes as “the lowest possible” freight costs.
By playing the role of sole middleman between a manufacturer and an end customer, BuildDirect claims it can reduce the cost of goods by as much as 80 per cent — with manufacturers making up in volume what they may lose on markup.

President, CEO and co-founder Jeff Booth was working as a contractor in 1999 when he got fed up with the absence of a reliable conduit to get flooring products into the hands of builders and retail buyers.
“I was building a home and the flooring didn’t arrive on time,” Booth recalled in an interview. “I had to put the people up in a hotel. I was infuriated at that problem.”
When he tracked the supply chain, he discovered a lengthy series of middlemen who simply didn’t know how long it would take to get product to its end user.
“I thought, if I’m in this business every day and I can’t figure it out, the end buyer doesn’t have a chance.”

The company offers manufacturers two advantages: one is an efficient network of independent carriers to deliver products on time; the other is a set of metrics that BuildDirect has developed to determine which products will be in the most demand — taking the guesswork out of a manufacturing run of a given product.
OMERS Ventures managing director Derek Smyth said the firm has been evaluating the ecommerce market in North America for the better part of the last year.
“We were looking for a company that had developed some vertical expertise in a market that was still in its infancy in terms of percentage of transactions being done in ecommerce. BuildDirect tended to be at the top of the list,” Smyth said.
“Delivery is a big part of the value proposition, and the expertise they’ve developed to do that for big and bulky things — currently being flooring — they are going to be able to apply to other categories as well.”

ssimpson@vancouversun.com

Read Full Post »

Kids Today Staff — 6/4/2012 12:16:40 PM

TORONTO — Sears Canada has rolled out baby-focused departments that will offer new and expecting parents product in furniture, gear and more.
The Baby Department has been placed in the Kids Room section in 55 stores across Canada. The retailer opened the departments last week with an event at its Toronto Eaton Centre store featuring Nanny Robina, a parenting expert and media personality who shared advice on how to stock a nursery with mom bloggers and expectant moms in attendance.
Tracy Culleton, vice president of The Kids Room at Sears Canada, said the baby area is divided into five marked sections: nursery, travel, activity, feeding and gifting. Specially trained associates are on hand in the department to assist new parents.
“The signing also provides all the features and benefits of the product assortment,” Culleton added. “Another new introduction is ‘take-with’ inventory. When customers are shopping for cribs, strollers or car seats, Sears now stocks these in store so that they can be taken home on the same day.”
“Sears has made a commitment to provide Canadian parents with the best information and high-quality products for every stage of their baby’s development. We have done the research for our customers and carefully selected the best products tailored to their unique needs,” said Calvin McDonald, president and CEO of Sears Canada. “Sears has been a prime destination in the past for new parents – a place that was guaranteed to have the high quality essentials they need and expert service to guide them along the way. We are getting back to those roots.”

Read Full Post »

Robert Half International

When the time comes to leave a job you’ve tired of, remember that you’ll leave much more than an empty desk behind. Colleagues may be more likely to remember your conduct in the final days than the high points of your tenure. Make sure you don’t erase years of hard work and positive goodwill with a less-than-graceful exit.

Here’s how to leave with your good reputation intact:
Avoid reaching the boiling point. Many workers are feeling increased stress and frustration on the job. A Robert Half survey found that 41 per cent of workers polled indicated that their current workloads are too heavy. But don’t let the growing tension you may feel cause you to lose your cool and lash out at your manager or colleagues.

If you feel you’re reaching the breaking point, take it as a sign that you might want to consider moving on. But until you accept another job offer, try to keep your frustration in check. It may help to blow off steam with trusted friends outside the workplace or to focus more on activities that bring you enjoyment, such as exercise, spending time with family or going to the movies.

Resign gracefully. Don’t dash off a terse resignation letter or march triumphantly into your manager’s office right after sealing the deal on your new job offer. Allow adequate time to frame your message.
Especially if you’re resigning in writing, let your email or letter sit overnight before submitting it. Ask an objective friend or family member to review what you’ve written to ensure you don’t come across as angry or bitter. And, although you may be beyond ready to take your leave, give adequate notice and offer to help with the transition. All of this serves to reinforce your professionalism.

Be candid but constructive. Do agree to participate in an exit interview, assuming one is offered. But don’t use it as an opening to release your frustrations and badmouth colleagues. While it’s fine to be candid, avoid personal attacks.
You’ll be doing everyone a favour — while maintaining your reputation — if you instead offer constructive criticism that can be used to improve the work environment. Also, your parting words will be given much more weight if you don’t come across as disgruntled.
Don’t gloat or broadcast your glee. Technology has certainly made it easier for dissatisfied employees to make a dramatic — and high profile — departure if they so desire. But no matter how aggrieved you may feel, resist the urge to send an email to everyone on the distribution list telling them how you really feel about the company.

And don’t use social media to nominate your soon-to-be-former manager for the sequel to the movie “Horrible Bosses.” Doing so could come back to haunt you later in your career.
Don’t leave the good behind. There are usually some positive aspects to even a negative job situation. Maybe you’ve had supportive colleagues who you don’t want to turn your back on. Not to mention, thanks to tools such as Facebook, it’s difficult to completely sever professional ties once you leave a position even if you want to. It’s easier to just leave on good terms by thanking those who’ve helped you in your position or offered guidance.
It’s also wise to mend fences with those you’ve had problems with. You never know how professional paths might intertwine again, so why not leave as many connections as you can intact?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,511 other followers